Mux for Proptech
A neutral, sourced look at where Mux fits for proptech work — and where BetterVideo differs on the things this work actually needs.
🔒 Footage deleted on your schedule — with a certificate to prove it
- Unit walkthroughs are shot by many different people on many different phones.
- Condition documentation has to be clear enough to resolve disputes later.
- You're processing thousands of clips, so it has to be an API, not an app.
Mux for this
Mux stores and streams property video reliably but doesn't enhance it — it won't make a shaky, soft walkthrough look consistent. Complementary: enhance with BetterVideo, stream with Mux.
Where BetterVideo fits
For proptech, BetterVideo upscales and sharpens handheld walkthroughs to a consistent standard across your whole inventory through the API, and deletes on your schedule.
BetterVideo vs Mux, side by side
| Criterion | BetterVideo | Mux |
|---|---|---|
| Category | documentation/verification | infrastructure |
| Data retention / privacy | Disclosed: auto-delete (default 30d) or on-demand; never trained on/sold | Disclosed: you control lifecycle; DELETE is permanent; test assets auto-deleted 24h |
| Self-host GPU required | No — managed | No — managed |
| Starting price | $0.03/sec (1080p) · $0.06/sec (4K) | encode from $0.025/min (720p) · deliver from $0.0008/min · store $0.0024/min-mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| API type | REST | REST |
Common questions
Can Mux improve walkthrough quality?
No — Mux delivers video; it doesn't enhance. BetterVideo handles enhancement.
Use Mux and BetterVideo together for proptech?
Yes — different layers of the stack.
Built for proptech footage
One REST call to enhance — deleted on your schedule, with a certificate to prove it.
Get your API key →