BetterVideo vs Mux
This one isn't really a competition — and saying so is the point. Mux is video infrastructure; BetterVideo is video enhancement. Many teams use both.
🔒 Footage deleted on your schedule — with a certificate to prove it
Two different layers of the stack
Mux is a streaming/encoding infrastructure API — it gets video encoded, stored and delivered to viewers reliably. It does not upscale, sharpen or restore the footage itself. BetterVideo does exactly that one job, then hands the improved file back.
A realistic pipeline: enhance a clip with BetterVideo, then store and stream it with Mux. They're complementary layers, not substitutes.
What that means for retention
As a store-and-stream platform, Mux keeps your video until you delete it (its DELETE is permanent) — retention is inherent to the product. BetterVideo is the opposite by design: footage is processed and then deleted on your schedule, because it never needed to keep it.
Side by side
| Criterion | BetterVideo | Mux (Video) |
|---|---|---|
| Category | documentation/verification | infrastructure |
| Data retention / privacy | Disclosed: auto-delete (default 30d) or on-demand; never trained on/sold | Disclosed: you control lifecycle; DELETE is permanent; test assets auto-deleted 24h |
| Self-host GPU required | No — managed | No — managed |
| Starting price | $0.03/sec (1080p) · $0.06/sec (4K) | encode from $0.025/min (720p) · deliver from $0.0008/min · store $0.0024/min-mo |
| Free tier | Yes | Yes |
| API type | REST | REST |
Common questions
Can Mux enhance or upscale video?
No — Mux is infrastructure for encoding, storing and streaming video, not for AI enhancement. BetterVideo handles the enhancement; the two can be used together.
Should I choose Mux or BetterVideo?
It's usually not either/or. Use BetterVideo to improve the footage and Mux to deliver it — they operate at different layers of the stack.
Enhance real footage — and prove it's gone
One REST call to upscale, sharpen and restore, with deletion on your schedule.
Get your API key →